What a Lovely Thursday

I can say that because tomorrow is the last substantive lecture! Hurray! No more force-fed rules of law! I'm so happy. :D

So, Mom goes in for her MRI tomorrow, huh? When will they have the results? I hope she doesn't have to get surgery or anything. Rest assured, though-- if she does, I'll come out there after the Bar to help out. OK?

I was going to call you tonight, but it's too late, I think. I just wanted to hear about how things are going out there. Rusty said things sounded OK except for Maija messing up the amp and Mom's arm still hurting. That's really rotten.

About the questions from last time-- you're absolutely right about the force majeur clause. Of course, putting that kind of thing in an MC makes it pretty clear cut! Force majeur is pretty much the default under the UCC anyway b/c of principles that excuse performance under those circumstances. I just thought it was unreasonable to expect the guy to delegate.

The other question-- you were totally right. That's exactly what the answer said. It stated that since it was likely that she was going to the funeral anyway, it can't really be said that she relied on her brother's statement. As for there being a contract, there definately wasn't one. However, under "quasi-contract" you can still recover if you reasonably relied on someone's statement (despite there being no contract-- you don't even have to have an offer!). That's where I got tripped up.

Anyway-- I better go. I still have flashcards to make. (But soon... there will be no more stinking flashcards!)

Oh-- below I have the entire schedule from here on out, in case you're interested. I also put a permanent link to the right, in case you should like to keep track of me!